I see another man has been arrested for the heinous crime of interfering with a criminal in the course of his employment.
Four men broke into his house at night. He had a shotgun (legal). He shot, but did not seriously injure them. So he has, naturally, been arrested on suspicion of causing grievous bodily harm. He is unlikely to have a shotgun licence ever again, assuming he manages to avoid prison, because he has used it to interfere with the Government’s preferred occupation of thievery. Hardly surprising this government supports the criminals, when you look at them.
Let that be a lesson to you all. If someone attacks you in your home and you damage them, finish them off and dump the body in the woods. Under no circumstances call the police. Defending yourself is illegal, no matter what the succession of empty-suits in office keep spouting. If you try to stop a gang of criminals in your own home with a legal weapon, the police will arrest you.
No, I do not accept that it was excessive force. Four burglars in your house in the middle of the night? Setting about them with a chainsaw would not be excessive. Very messy, but not excessive. As for the idiots in the Mail, all they can do is head the story ‘shooting horror’ (not ‘home invasion horror’, you notice) and keep harping on that this man’s gun was legal, with the implicit assumption that no guns should be.
The Mail supports antismoker hatred, anti-fatty hatred, Government control of the internet and the total disarmament of the population. I seem to remember a time when they were referred to as ‘right-wing’ but they are Communists to the core now. The whole article portrays the burglars as victims of the man with the gun.
I’ve never owned a live-round gun. I used to have an air rifle but sold it. Guns are noisy and need proper maintenance or they’ll blow up in your face. They can be rendered useless in legal hands simply by stopping the supply of ammunition.
If there’s one thing I learned from that time on the streets, many years ago, it’s that those who fight fair always lose. So I won’t be facing any burglars nor will I engage in conversation of any kind. I’ll garotte them from behind with a guitar string or belt them over the head with the nearest heavy thing. Call the police? They now wear black, same as the criminals. The police would arrest me and the criminals would sue for lost earnings.
When the last gun has been rounded up and locked away for the Government to use on you, it will make no difference to me. I’ve never used one anyway and probably couldn’t hit a barn door if I did.
But give me a set of darts or a good hefty pebble…
It has gone beyond farcical when a man is arrested for defending his home and family from a gang of intruders. It’s not as if it’s the first such case either.
Will the Mail try for a shotgun ban now? They’ve been quietly pushing for an airgun ban for a long time so I suppose it’s inevitable. Soon there won’t be a legal weapon in the land.
The criminals, of course, will still have loads of illegal ones. Nobody seems to mind about that.