The Direction of Progression (with multiple digression).

When I was a mere mini-freak, my father was a coal miner and a Labour supporter right up until Neil Kinnock became our constituency MP. I had no idea what ‘politics’ meant because I was small and interested in toy guns and toads, but when your father is in a blistering rage and you were small in the sixties, then you had to listen in to find out what he was angry at. In case it was you. In those days, parental authority was to be respected because it held the potential to be backed up by real punishment. My father worked the coal face at the mine. He didn’t need to hit us. He only needed to look as though he might, and we would take the matter no further. I can only recall one smacking and me and my brother had done something really, really bad. Mother used to smack us but she was only little and it didn’t hurt.

It wasn’t me he was annoyed at this time. It was a bigger ginger bloke than me with a bigger nose and a shoutier voice. My father knew him from the past, apparently, and was, shall we say, less than impressed. Many words were heard, words that really should only have been heard echoing around a coal mine when they’ve dug the wrong way. I don’t think he’s voted since, but we don’t talk politics. There are much more interesting and important matters in the world.

Even after the rudder-nosed one took office, my father still went to the local workingmen’s club, which was called ‘The Progressive’, because it had the cheapest beer. This was referred to as ‘The Prog’ by its inmates and has just one claim to fame. When Tom Jones was just starting out, he landed a gig at the Prog and was paid off before the end of his first set. All that hipswinging and shouting was not for them, and he was told he would never work in that club again. To this day, he never has. When the Prog management make a decision, it’s binding. Just think, if he hadn’t blown it, he could be earning as much as ten pounds a night now.

At the tender age of dirtiface and nosepick, the word ‘progressive’ had no meaning beyond being the name of the place Dad came home from cheerfully plastered. As I grew through the ages of girlogle and acne, into the adulthood of workyabugger and paytax, I have begun to wonder what it means. There is a strict dictionary definition, it is a derivation of the word ‘progress’ which means, in simple terms,  to move in a direction.

Not necessarily a physical direction. If I were to take up chess, I’d be crap because I haven’t played more than five games since school. If I practised and studied the game, I could potentially actually win one. I could say I had made progress. (Another digression: We found, early on, that airgun chess was a much more fun game, quicker, with more action and no dispute about whether a piece should be regarded as ‘taken’. So I’d have to relearn the rules of the game if I took it up now).

However, where Socialism is concerned, I am becoming increasingly convinced that the word ‘progressive’ has no meaning at all and never has. It is, like so many of the utterances that spew forth from the mouths without minds, just a noise in the air. It has as much real meaning as the wind whistling through a leaky window.

Yet they ascribe meaning to it. Deep meaning. They think that when they introduce another step into the Dark Ages, that’s progress. Well, of a sort, I suppose, but we have generally regarded ‘progress’ as meaning things getting better, not worse. Like the discovery of antibiotics. That was progress. It made a lot of incurable things curable. The overuse of antibiotics leading to hospitals being full of bacteria resistant to antibiotics was not progress. The medical profession pretending it was all caused by farms was nothing short of wooga-wooga medicine man talk.

Maybe they are progressing towards some hideous goal, just in the opposite direction to common sense. There are those at the top who know what they are doing, they are clever and evil, but they are backed up by a huge army of idiots who have no idea what’s going on. Idiots who parrot what they are told without a single thought in their heads. More and more of those idiots are reaching positions of influence now.

This was becoming clear in science in the late seventies/early eighties when I was an undergraduate. By the time I reached PhD level, a professor had taken the head of department job even though he really didn’t want it. Doesn’t make sense, does it? It does when you consider that a real scientist doesn’t want promotion. A real scientist wants to stay in the lab and do some science. Money and prestige are not motivations for real scientists. The only motivations are ‘Ooo, look at that’ and ‘I wonder how that works?’ There are a few left but their numbers are declining due to ‘progress’.

For years, the scientists had booted the useless and the politically motivated out of the labs and into management roles. They reasoned, as scientists are wont to do, it being their job and all, that these bloody wasters would do less harm shuffling paper than messing with dangerous things. They were wrong, and that professor saw it. Sure, the scientists in the lab were intelligent and dedicated but those in charge were politically motivated morons. They soon started to make decisions on who should be employed in the lab, and what projects should run. That professor retired years ago and he was a mental wreck by the time they’d finished with him.

It’s not much different in politics. I don’t want to be an MP, I can find much more interesting things to do. I don’t want two homes and a chauffeur and an armed bodyguard and sycophants are just going to get hit with something spiky and I will not listen to the Whitehall mandarins and I do not respond well to psychological tricks because I recognise them and they annoy me.

One that seems prevalent in supermarkets is the slow advance. The git behind you in the queue will take small steps forward to push you into getting out of the way faster. Well, okay, it’s fun on one level. I mean, I’m not much to look at but I can look at you as if you’re lunch and I have the teeth to back it up. American dental perfection? You can keep it. I have fangs.

As soon as I see the game begin, my pack rate slows. I have been known to take everything out of a bag and repack it. Amateurs still don’t get it. Two women tried the slow advance on me and I decided to pay by credit card. Card in slot, they were at my shoulder, I turned to stare at them and said to the cashier “I’ll put in the number when these card thieves look away.”

Another woman, a small one, actually had no patience and appeared right next to me at the till as soon as the last whisky bottle went through. I smiled a gentle smile at the cashier (one that doesn’t show teeth) and said “This young lady seems to want to pay for my purchases.” She backed off fast.

I don’t see any need to show mercy to the drones. They will fall for any old crap. Might as well be crap I’ve made up. The socialists see them as cattle, I see them only as idiots.

Shameless? Why not? In recent years I have realised that shame and guilt are mere constructs,easily discarded, and not part of human nature at all. I am no victim. I refuse to be a victim. I’m just this guy, you know?

In the smoky world, one of the drones is Googling his own name and finding blogs that insult him. He will get no attention here. He thinks he is a mover and shaker but his mind is a drone mind, unmovable and not worth trying to engage with. All he wants is attention. It’s sad, but I have no concept of mercy so my teeth are bared. He’ll have to Google Sillly Arse to find his mention here.

His idea of progress is to change packs of cigarettes that are not legal to sell to under -18s and also hidden behind doors so that they do not visually appeal to the young. That’s like painting all coal white before it’s brought out of the mine so it doesn’t offend racial sensitivities. Oh, why did I say that? It’s just a matter of time now, isn’t it?

I used to have a Count Duckula DVD with flashing LEDs on the cover. I like old cartoons, they used to be free from politics and have more connection with reality that any modern politician could ever manage. So if there was a pack of Rothmans with a flashy light on the box, why would it matter if it is hidden behind big doors marked ‘Addict Filth Supplies’? Ah but you cannot stop at the point of hiding all the stuff because then Progess has ended. There must be more Progress so the hidden stuff must not look like stuff. There is no end. There can be no end, only more Progress.

The drones are locked into this. There must always be progress because they are progressive, but there can never be an end point because that means there is no more progress and then they will not be progressive and will lose all identity. They cannot separate identity from politics.

I realise this is rambling but well, that just happens sometimes. I don’t have a firm grasp on what the deep background contains so this is a bit meandering for now.

Part of the idea of ‘progressive’ in a Socialist sense is starting to become clear.

There is this.

And there is the extension of tobacco controls to sweets.

Bound to happen. It’s Progress. There can be no end to it because an end means that Progress stops. Will the drones accept it?

I was in my local Asda recently with my three children (all under 8 and so this was rare as I usually don’t take them) and when we got to the till each of them asked for a sweet from the counter. I said ‘no’ each time but of course each of them got upset and my 4 year old ended up in tears. So yes I said ‘no’ and yes I didn’t fall for the ‘impulse buy’ or ‘ pester power’ BUT I do not appreciate in the slightest the horrendous end to our shopping trip caused by Asda. So yes we should take control as all comments suggest but the supermarkets DO have a responsibility because they know whet they are doing and it isn’t acceptable to simply let them off the hook.- Paulie , Durham, 06/9/2012 10:10

Caused by ASDA? Whatever goes wrong is not your fault. You are not a useless fucker of a parent, it’s ASDA selling the things they have always sold in the way everyone else has always sold them that is to blame here.

The natural corollary: If you succeed it wasn’t you. Everything you work for belongs to everyone else and especially to those who sat on their arses and let you work.

Go on, Socialist drones. Explain how that is ‘progress’.

13 thoughts on “The Direction of Progression (with multiple digression).

  1. “Go on, Socialist drones. Explain how that is ‘progress’.”

    Because it makes them feel better about themselves. The same reason why the original “progressives” (Margret Sanger, etc.) were big on things like eugenics; the idea of -control-, of being the grand and wise planners of utopia, made them, feel so good – and kept them from ever having so much as entertain thoughts of guilt about their actions or motivations.

    Hell, look at Marx himself – major moocher and deadbeat, total manipulative bastard even to hsi own father and daughter. So he created an ideology that made mooching and deadbeating a virtue – and one that would require a great deal of manipulating of others to achieve its “noble” ends. For everyone’s own good, of course.

  2. I’ve found the best way to handle the impatient folk in the queue who get too close behind you is to totally ignore them and make out that you hadn’t noticed. And then turn around suddenly to pick up an item that you ‘forgot’ . Gives them a fright when you almost stand on top of them. Oops sorry didn’t realise you were so close behind me. Then waste even more time chatting to them about the weather or some other shit.

    There was a fireman on Radio Scotland the other day bemoaning the fact that people pick up their weekly supply of drink at the same time as the rest of their shopping. ‘As if it’s like any other item’. Maybe he thinks we should do two trips to the supermarket ? He was a spokesman for some alcohol concern body or something. I’d love to see what he buys at the supermarket. Maybe he does pop back later for a bottle of wine. Wouldn’t surprise me with these strange people that are popping up in the media these days.

    ITV did a report on the fact that oil companies are slow to reduce prices on petrol when crude prices fall. Not a peep about the 80% tax or the fact that the oil company and petrol station take the buttons while the govt takes your shirt. Clueless drones in the media.

    • ‘As if it’s like any other item’.
      A fireman, are you sure?

      “it is not like other types of food and drink.”

      Supermarkets urged to keep alcohol separate
      1 March 2011

      “Its chief executive, Don Shenker, said: “It’s now common practice to sell wine next to ready-meals, pushing the idea that a relaxing meal should be accompanied by an alcoholic drink.”

      “Doctors’ leaders have backed the calls for supermarkets to change the way they display alcohol.

      Dr Vivienne Nathanson, head of science and ethics for the British Medical Association, said: “We have to start de-normalising alcohol – it is not like other types of food and drink.”

      “Dr Nathanson said: “Having separate alcohol areas in supermarkets is only one aspect of a comprehensive strategy that the government needs to introduce to tackle alcohol misuse.”
      http: //www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-12599471

      Previously

      22 October 2008

      “Shoppers buying alcohol at the supermarket face a ‘walk of shame’ to a dedicated checkout counter.

      The plan is being drawn up by ministers to curb Britain’s growing binge-drinking culture.
      Stores would have to create the ‘alcohol-only’ areas manned by specially-trained staff.

      This would hopefully deter shoppers from making excessive purchases by putting them under the scrutiny of fellow customers.”

      “Effectively, it would bring alcohol sales into line with tobacco sales in supermarkets.”

      “The draft code of practice drawn up by the Home Office and the Department of Health also proposes cigarette-style health warnings about the dangers of alcohol for display in shops, bars and restaurants.”
      http: //www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1079515/Supermarket-shoppers-face-walk-shame-alcohol-checkout-counter.html

      This annoyed me particularly.

      “Teetotallers should be celebrated instead of shunned as pariahs, the Health Secretary will say today.

      In a devastating assessment of Britain’s addiction to alcohol, Alan Johnson will dismiss ‘ whimsical’ notions that the Government could succeed in creating a continental ‘cafe culture’.

      It will be seen as a stinging rebuke for ministers who claimed Labour’s controversial 24-hour licensing would do just that.

      Instead, Mr Johnson will demand a wider, fundamental shift in attitudes to alcohol. In a speech to the Royal Society of Arts, he will liken the ‘disdain’ with which nondrinkers are treated to that of non-smokers in previous decades.”
      http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1163092/Teetotallers-new-pariahs–Health-Secretary-warns-Britains-drink-habit.html

      Rubbish.
      I can only be made a pariah once and Anti-tobacco got there first.

  3. I love the comment about Asda. When my kids (5 and 2) get to the till, and whine for sweets, they get told in no uncertain terms NO. If they keep whining, they know they’ll get a smack. And I’m not afraid to do it there and then in the store. And if anyone wants to but in about me smacking my kids, they’ll get a smack too. Its the only way they’ll learn (the adults that is, my kids already have and don’t whine).

    If you change your mind, and do want a sycophant, then I’m game. I’m not afraid of spikey things, and its fun to take the piss while sycophantising (is that a real word?). The game can be “can you tell which bits are pisstaking”, which is one of your favourite games anyway! But we have to do it over a bottle of laphroaig, and you’re paying :-)

  4. Vaguely on-topic. That luxury car thing?

    Mercedes has pulled the plug on the Maybach!

    And one high profile owner was Duncan Bannatyne.

    If he holds on to it for about 40 years it’ll become a collectable. Between now and then it’ll depreciate like a politicians reputation.

    Pity they chose a name so closely associated with a guy Nostradamus miss-named Hister.

  5. What grates with me is how these Krebs-type totalitarian tyrants always seem to be able to get their pontifications into newspapers and on TV. What is so interesting about them? I sometimes think that the editors of these publications know that what is being said is outrageous interference in the affairs of private families and that they publish these remarks just to cause controversy and sell more papers. Or, they could even be trying to influence government just to see how far they can push and get away with it.

  6. A while ago I developed a hypothesis about Socialism, a very simple one but then they’re mostly simple too. It goes like this: Socialists think that they’re right. They think that they’ve got everything worked out, and that if everybody’d just do things the sensible way (i.e. their way) everybody’d be happy ever after.

    The tool they always seem to come back to for achieving this state of meta-harmony is compulsion. It always comes down to laws, laws and more laws with Socialists, and they never stop, take a look at the entire morass of laws and say “Right, this is a bloody mess; let’s delete all the stuff we don’t need and remove all the repetitions and superfluous junk and make it nice and streamlined and easy to use”. No, the solution to a mindwarping mess of laws is always more laws layered on top of the last lot.

    Microsoft used to do that, and ended up with dog-slow buggy piles of shite, which were also riddled with security holes. Computer code, judicial code; same thing really. The BSD project went the other way; went looking for stuff to get rid of and new ways to achieve the same old ends. The codebase of BSD unix is shrinking over time, and getting faster, and less buggy. Less code, less places for bugs and security holes to hide. Same thing applies to laws: make ‘em simple, make ‘em small and let the courts sort out the nitty gritty.

    If you think about it logically, lawyers are really just a symptom of a failing judicial system. If you need expensive experts to make sense of a code of laws then you’re failing in the purpose of laws, which are to make life fair and to do so in a simple way; the system ought to be so simple that a very few experts can understand and administer it.

    Viewed this way, Socialism is more or less distilled, super-concentrated failure. It makes the judicial system more complicated over time, more likely to fail, harder to use. It introduces bugs, holes and security holes. Socialism also completely buggers a financial system every time it is tried out. Really, the words “Look, you’re just a prat; piss off now” are about all that you ever need with Socialism.

  7. I wrote some stuff about what ‘progressive’ meant :

    1. Progressive thought places individual rights below group rights – the rejection of individualism is central. Thus the “left” (if that is synonymous with “progressive”) place the interests of the group – however defined – above the interests of individual members of the group.

    2. Since this idea runs counter to a liberal view there are considerable grounds for confusion over what are thought to be universal ideas – non-discrimination, choice and rights. Put simply the liberal places these rights with the individual whereas the progressive places them with the group.

    And the consequence of this world view:

    “This corporate state – where policy discussion is mediated through interest groups with access to the rulers and where communication with the wider populace is done through granting privileged access to selected speakers in those interest groups, in the media and through the structures of political organisation. The “progressive” idea – founded in great hope at the improvement of man and man’s organisation – has become a monster. The individual has no power any more to say: “no, I don’t want to do that.” That right does not belong to him but to the group he belongs with – who have of course negotiated a “compromise” with the rulers.”

    Here’s to the revolution!

  8. “The natural corollary: If you succeed it wasn’t you. Everything you work for belongs to everyone else and especially to those who sat on their arses and let you work.”

    Which was, in fact, the gist of a speech by Obama a few days ago.

    QED, mate.

  9. On the alternative meanings of words, I’ve noticed that politicians have their own versions of :
    Fair*
    Equality**
    Community Cohesion***

    *taking money away from those evil enough to earn it, whilst sneering in their faces
    **special treatment for certain groups
    ***cultivating riots and bloodshed

  10. Pingback: The joys of progression. | Daily Pundit

Comments are closed.