Cock Roache.

The media haven’t come up with that one yet. They used to have some imagination in the old days.

The man who plays Ken Barlow on possibly the most tedious programme ever to be televised was accused of being a sex pest. Well, everyone gets accused of that now, unless they have pure Leftie credentials. The trolls long ago added ‘paedo’ to their ‘racist-Nazi-bigot’ mindless whine so it’s no surprise to find that anyone and everyone is now being accused of it.

Bill Roache was found not guilty on all counts. So that’s the end of that then, right?

Nope. The Daily Mail ain’t letting it go so easily.

So he slept with a thousand women. No wonder he looks tired. So what, though?

As the court case has shown, he didn’t rape or assault any of them.

In fact, I doubt he’d have the energy after all that…

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Cock Roache.

  1. If he was found innocent, then who are the guilty ones ?
    let the paper publish thier stories and then perhaps we can see the balanced picture.

    Like

      • Quite. He has been found not guilty. That should be the end of it. The Mail is repeating a claim that it had already admitted was false. He never at any point said he had slept with 1000 women. The Mail know this claim to be untrue yet persist with repeating is as part of their smear campaign.

        And, being a womaniser is not the same thing as being a sexual predator. Again we have the media deliberately muddying the terms.

        Like

  2. Roach expressed doubt that there were witches. In classic witch hunt fashion this put him under suspicion of being a witch himself.

    They never do learn any new tricks, do they?

    Like

  3. The guilty ones are those who made the accusations, along with The CPS who relied on such flawed evidence, some of which was all to easy to disprove. But they don’t seem to be guilty of a crime, for some reason that escapes me.

    Like

  4. It is we who have failed, our lords and masters have given us the offering of Roach and we have failed to attack and vilify him. So the Mail and MMS will continue to tell us of his immoral escapades and sexual carry ons, until we relent and believe he is a predator!

    Like

    • I no longer believe Jimmy Saliva did a damn thing wrong. He is called paedophile but there’s no evidence he ever touched a child. Sure, he did some things I’d consider immoral but not actually illegal. And what man, faced with teenage girls throwing themselves at him every day, can honestly say he’d never give in once in a while?

      Like

  5. I declined the ghoulish voyeurism of a saga which bore all the hallmarks of a tragic climax. I am no Roache fan but his acquittal was a pleasant surprise in view of the ferocity of a nasty smear campaign and the politics of UK ‘Justice’..

    Like

    • Good to see the business owner telling the professionally offended to take a running jump. I see they have sock puppets demanding a boycott of his business because he was ‘looking for publicity’.

      No he wasn’t. The rape charity took it to the papers, not him.

      Like

First comments are moderated to keep the spambots out. Once your first comment is approved, you're in.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s