Frank Davis has the details of the new ridiculous ban on smoking in your own car if it has a child infestation. Getting the infestation out won’t help for long. The law hasn’t even been passed yet and ham-ASH are already demanding an amendment to ‘protect adults too’. Vapers, I’d hold off on the smugness for a while this time if I were you. You must know by now that you are next.
It was never about ‘the cheeldren’. These antismoking filth use children in the same way HAMAS use them. As disposable human shields. Jeremy the Total and Utter Hunt (the smug-faced bastard is pictured exuding self-righteousness in the Daily Twat) really should be right up there with Abu Hamza and all the rest of the intolerant preachers of hate, but soon it will be illegal even to hint at that. The anti-extremism laws are designed to stop us complaining about extremists such as those in government. Stalin would be so proud of our Tory leaders.
Get a ‘No Children’ sticker for your car. Someone slightly more sober could probably design one right now. Something along the lines of the ‘No Fat Birds’ warning that’s on British booze. I’ll try to take a quick image off this bottle of whisky with my crappy phone camera –
The phone camera is rubbish at close work in poor light (it’s pretty rubbish anyway) and I’m a trifle unsteady. Good enough to give you the idea. The ‘No fat birds’ warning is next to the ‘This might make your head spin’ warning.
What we need is a ‘No children’ sign for cars. Also disinfectant, sprays and traps (humane, if you must. I prefer the opposite) to keep them out.
The next stage will be a ‘No nonsmokers’ sign. Then a ‘Nobody’ sign.
We could just skip right ahead to the big ‘NO’ sign, I think. When I had that Mk II Cortina in 1979, I often drove around with only a driver’s seat and the rest of the space used for carrying stuff. If I still had that car I’d take out all the other seats and pull up next to hitchikers again, like in the old days. I’d never put those other seats back in and would defy the arresting knobhead to find my passenger.
Incidentally, the whisky bottle now says ‘This bottle contains 28 measures’ rather than ’28 units’. Turns out it’s the same thing but this time, I think we have them under trades description laws. I have never managed to get 28 drinks out of a 750 ml bottle of anything. Do they think I drink from a thimble?
Dammit, next thing you know they’ll make it illegal to swig whisky while driving in case a child manages to sneak in to the car. Where will it all end?
If a child does get into your car, you will be arrested under the ‘Jimmy Savile Impersonator’ laws because well, if there is a child in your car, you must be a perv. If you gave birth to that child you are a grow-your-own perv. Get out of that. Best start working on your answer, you’ll need it soon.
Drive fast past a school and you are a potential child killer. Drive slowly past a school and you are obviously ogling your next target, you filthy paedo. Drive fast or drive slow. Your choice. Remember, driving under 20 mph is officially kerb crawling. The UK speed limit past schools is…?
Probably safest to drop the kids off three streets away and let them take their chances. It’s them or you.
In the land of those rebel colonists who think they won the war of independence (ha ha, don’t tell them) they are getting speed cameras outside schools. Well, hard to argue against that but Nasal Man does a convincing one. What he misses is that under their 6th amendment (the right to face your accuser) and in the wording of the fixed penalty notice (your car was speeding) there is no need for the driver or the owner to be involved.
Legally, in the strict sense, the accused is the car and the accuser is the camera. Get a good lawyer with a sense of humour and plenty of time and this one could run and run.
See, if you accept and respond to the accusation, it’s your word against the camera’s. You cannot win this one. If you were parked and the camera says you were doing ninety, you will lose. The court will take an inanimate object’s word over yours. Yes, we really are there now. For the children.
No. It isn’t. It’s for the money and the control.
Whenever you hear ‘for the children’, remember that. They don’t give a shrew’s frenulum for the children. The children are just their human shields. These people are the same as all the ones they call ‘evil’. Exactly the same.
HAMAS, ISIS, Al Qaeda, all believe they are doing their work for good.
So do public health, the idiot government and all their hangers-on.
The thing is, it’s not for my good or your good. They, none of them, are at all concerned about that. It’s all for their good. Their agenda. What they believe life should be like (for you, not for them. It’s like how you think life should be like for farmed trout – that is what they think of you).
And, all of them, if they can use your children as weapons against you, well, they have no problem with that.
Careful in your response. Criticising Government actions will soon be illegal, like in China, and they will take your children into protection. You will be an extremist and an unfit parent.
Object right now, or shut your gob and take it up the khyber forever. The window of opportunity is closing. Fast.
Look again at your children. Are they yours? Or are they ‘ours’ to take from you as and when we see fit, for whatever reason we decide to make up? Thinking time is over. The timer has started and it won’t take long.
Make your choice.
Then live with it.