Modern Politics

I don’t have a political affiliation. I agree with some points from each side of the divide but not by enough to actually join either side. That’s because every side has things I definitely won’t support.

On immigration, for example. Here’s how I’d do it.

Anyone can come in. Anyone at all. No restrictions. BUT…

Anyone moving to a country must adopt the laws and customs of that country. We have had the ridiculous situation in the UK where a rapist was released because ‘he didn’t know rape was illegal’. Yes, really. Ignorance of the law used to be no excuse. Now, by precendent, it is a valid defence. Any good defence lawyer could get anyone off any crime with the ‘I didn’t know’ argument and cite that case as precedent.

In some countries, having multiple wives is fully legal and normal. In some, marrying children is legal and normal. Those two are not religion-based. They are culture based. In some countries, beating to death those who don’t agree with your religion is legal and normal. In some countries, people are divided into a social heirarchy based on an arbitrary matrix that depends on which parents you are born to. If you want to move to those countries, you have to accept that those things are legal and normal there.

They are neither legal nor normal in the UK. Do those who come here accept that? Actually, most do. A small number do not and yet they are not corrected nor punished by the courts. They are excused with ‘It’s their culture innit?’

Well you try having a gay pride march in Saudi Arabia and tell them ‘it’s your culture innit’ and see how far that gets you. Telll Mexico you don’t like chillies so they have to stop putting them in the food. Tell France they have to give up wine and garlic because you don’t like those things. Go to America and tell them you don’t agree with their Constitution and demand they do things your way.

If you are lucky, those countries will just deport you. Some of them have other, more permanent, solutions.

Different countries have different laws and different cultures. Which set of laws, which culture is the best one? That is entirely subjective. It depends on what you like and how you want to live.

I own no guns and don’t want one. I don’t need one in the UK, we don’t have bears or wolves or mountain lions or poisonous snakes (well, we have the adder but for normal healthy people its bite is painful but rarely deadly, and I haven’t seen one in the wild in 58 years). If I wanted to own a gun I would move to a country that allows it.

The UK does allow hunting/target rifles and shotguns if you want to go through all the paperwork to get one. They are expensive and I really have no use for one so I haven’t bothered. Handguns are banned for everyone except criminals. They aren’t hard to get if you hang around the right people. But they are unregulated and there is a chance it’ll blow your hand off first time you fire it – and of course, there are no practice ranges or any form of training available.

If I moved to a country where I might well find a dangerous animal in my garden one day, one that is very likely to kill me, then I would like that country to allow me to own enough firepower to win that fight. Basically, if your country has large predators and your people can’t have guns, I don’t want to go there.

So I’m happy where I am. I don’t want or need a gun here. The most dangerous animals to venture into my garden are badgers and foxes and they’ll leave you alone unless you severely provoke them.

We currently have immigrants who come from places where it’s normal – and sometimes actually necessary – to be armed at all times. They have escaped that country and, I suppose, old habits die hard. Carrying a machete is just normal to them, they’ve done it all their lives. Nobody seems to have told them that it is not only not necessary here, it is actually very illegal indeed.

Move to a country, adapt to that country. Do not try to foce them to adapt to you or accept you in some ludicrous ‘multiculturalism’ experiment. Multi-ethnic societies do just fine, the UK was one for a long time before the insanity set in and okay, we had racists, including violent ones (I’m thinking skinheads, we used to call them Densa Boys but never to their faces) but they never had popular support. Now we have a lot fewer openly racist idiots but practically everyone is called racist. It’s as if someone wants to stir up the old Skinhead days.

Multiculturalism cannot work. One culture does not carry anything bigger than a pocket knife. Another thinks a machete is a necesary tool at all times. Another decides it’s fine to get a gun and just shoot your rivals. You cannot mix these things.

So, in my hypothetical country of Underdoggia, you can come and go as you please. While here, you live by our laws and our customs. You can bring new customs and new ideas and if they prove popular, we’ll adopt them.

If you can get here, we let you in. We are not paying you to come, we are not providing free transport and we are not responsible for your welfare while you are here. You want a house? Buy or rent one. You want a regular income? Get a damn job.

The one exception would be healthcare. I would have a central health system run by a Public Health department whose remit was to cure disease and prevent its spread. Mission creep will be stamped on hard and some will no doubt go to jail for misuse of (very limited) public funds.

It is possible that people will arrive who are running from a place where there is a rampant epidemic of something nasty. They will need to be screened and if necessary, isolated and cured before being released into the general population. Otherwise they’ll soon be running, like everyone else, from the same rampant epidemic in Underdoggia. So yes, we do need a central and ‘free’ (paid through taxes) health system but only for actual illnesses. No lifestyle controls. If you want to spend the entirety of your one and only visit to this life in a cocaine coma, well you just go ahead. As long as you don’t bother anyone else, nobody cares.

You can, of course, take out medical insurance to cover things that are annoying but not fatal or debilitating, and you can pay for elective surgery if you want it, but the central health system, the ‘free’ part, is only there to try to stop you dying (or to make it at least painless if incurable) and to prevent the spread of disease. Nothing more. It does not judge your lifestyle, it just tries to fix what is wrong with you.

No current political party would support that approach. One side wants ‘anything goes’ open borders and the other wants a points system where you have to prove you don’t need any help before they give it to you. I want something in between. Nobody offers it.

You can move to Underdoggia if you have nothing, but making something of your life is up to you. There are no free rides. If you have paid in to the system there is a safety net in case you are suddenly unable to work or lose your job through no fault of your own. You can live on it but it won’t be fun – unless you are permanently and irrevocably unable to work. Then we can be a bit more generous.

There’s a catch though. You have to have at least paid in or been born here. You can’t drag your legless torso across half the planet to get freebies. That sounds cruel and it is, but if I were to offer free stuff to all the world’s cripples, all the world will send them here and I’d be bankrupt within a year. Underdoggia is a pleasant place but it has to run on a budget. It cannot afford to take on all the world’s ills. If it tries it will die and then we all starve.

It’s a good feeling to be able to say you will take all the poor, the damned and the useless and it’s a laudable aim. Sure, take in everyone who can’t fend for themselves but how are you going to pay for it? Do that as a country and your working population will be taxed to the hilt. They will resent you and they will resent those you brought in. Then they rebel. They vote for anyone who says they will stop you and well, you can guess where that ends up. I mean, it’s not as if it hasn’t happened many times before.

It’s happening again. Politics is becoming more and more violent. Parties are relying more and more not on ‘what we will do for you’ but on ‘what they will do to you’. You are not voting for improvements, you are voting to not be the ones sent to the camps. It won’t work, it never does. Jews who collaborated with the Nazis, even the ones working in factories that made Nazi war helmets, were sent to the death camps anyway. You vote for death camps, don’t be surprised when you end up in one.

We all hear about the 1930s/40s and Hitler’s mob. Cambodia’s regime was more recent than that. North Korea is still doing it. Don’t imagine humanity has outgrown death camps. We’ve just found better ways to justify them. It is not over yet, not by a long way.

This round of divisive, ‘the other side is wrong about absolutely everything’ politics is the most vicious yet. There is no middle ground any more. You will have to choose a side soon and whichever one you choose, millions of people will want to kill you.

Underdoggia will remain neutral. A safe haven where you can watch the world devour itself in hate.

What a pity it doesn’t exist.




5 thoughts on “Modern Politics

  1. I spoke at length on the phone yesterday with a Tory MSP. I had already spoken to SNP and Labour ones recently about Scotland’s grim demographic situation regarding the very low fertility rate up here (1.53 children per woman in 2016) and the ‘ticking time-bomb’ of an ageing population. I thought they might care about this. Some chance!

    I had hoped that I could make them see some sense in promoting family life, as opposed to abortion, ‘family planning’ and LGBT lifestyles. To Labour and the SNP I was probably evil incarnate. The Tory agreed with me on some issues and said she was always accused of being “old-fashioned”. I assured her that there are millions of us of a similar mind.

    I asked her if there were many MSPs like her, but she wasn’t sure. “More than five?” I asked. I got the impression that she was ploughing a lonely furrow. She did tell me that she sometimes wonders why she went into politics.

    From what I have heard and read, almost every politician believes that more and more immigration is the only permissible, justified-by-PC, answer to the alternative future of there being insufficient workers and taxpayers to fund the oldies.

    Talking to the SNP woman was quite funny, because she was justifying mass immigration by saying what a wonderful contribution people from Norway and the USA were making to Scotland. She didn’t try to convince me by naming any Middle Eastern countries, just people from the Continent and N. America.

    You would think that if anyone cared about the – how can I put it without sounding racist, which I’m not in the slightest – genetically Scottish people – disappearing altogether, it would be the SNP, but the MSP I spoke to wasn’t at all concerned, because people will continue to come here from all over the world and they will speak Scots English and Gaelic, wear tartan, play the bagpipes, shoot haggis and so on and nothing will change. Historically, though, that’s not what has happened, for example, the incomers to the Lowlands means that the Gaelic-speakers are now almost solely in the Highlands & Islands.

    Similar thing centuries before, as you know, when incomers pushed out the Britons (Welsh) into what is now Wales.

    Professor Robert Wright, an expert in population economics at Strathclyde University (2016):

    “The Scottish population has not been capable of replacing itself for 45 years and it is not going to get back in that situation overnight. There are more deaths than births, but that gap is being filled by positive net migration. If we were left to our own devices we would disappear.”

    And this doesn’t even show as a pixel on the political radar.

    Sorry, it’s another long diatribe from me, but I have to say that although the Tory was a breath of fresh air in some ways, she was extremely frustrating in being as PC as the other parties in some areas. Almost everyone is infected by the disease of PC. I was quite shocked by her views on euthanasia, so I can’t see any hope that we will ever have a conservative Prime Monster ever again.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. This is why it’s a bit difficult being a Brit in France. But only morally. I want Britain to leave for it’s own sake, but not for mine personally.
    France has been a lot more kind to me than Britain ever was or ever will be, both financially and culturally. No one is ever rude to old people, and shop assistants don’t know how to ignore a customer.
    Everybody owns a gun but no one actually shoots people, except perhaps in Paris. But then Paris isn’t France.
    So I won’t be going anywhere.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. Underdoggia cannot work. Who will police those who do not take on the culture of Underdoggia? It would have to become a Totalitaruan State, imo. Immigration isn’t a solution to the aging population either as that will bring dissolution . The solution is to promote marriage and children as a desired goal for anyone’s life, and pride in our western culture/nations. We have become reduced to snivelling apologists. The points system in any country indicates we have something precious, that we will share if you, as an immigrant, will contribute to.

    Liked by 1 person

First comments are moderated to keep the spambots out. Once your first comment is approved, you're in.

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.