Bang! Bang! Maxwell’s in the slammer

Posted on by

So the tinfoil hatters were right after all. Again.

We are legion

Epstein and his sidekick Maxwell were trafficking children for rich and powerful paedophiles to abuse. The guilty verdicts are in, the sentencing awaits – but something is missing.

In similar trials, as have been happening in the UK a lot in recent years, it’s not just the procurement arm of these vile organisations that gets prosecuted. They prosecute the abusers too.

Well, how can someone be accused of trafficking children to abusers, have a trial where 33 of the victims testify, be found guilty, and not identify one single abuser? Who was she (and Epstein) trafficking these children to? If there is no end point, is there even a case? Did they just take them to a theme park? Well obviously not. Those children were seriously abused and it might well still be happening since the end-of-line abusers are not in the dock and have not even been named.

The information has been sealed. We might never know who those abusers are but we can be sure they are still at large. Epstein and Maxwell were never part of ‘the elite’, those with enough power to hide their tracks. They were just errand-runners. Those high ranking paedos will find new errand runners and this time, they’ll be more careful about letting them have a very visible public profile. This trial will do nothing to stop the abuse. It will just make the abusers more careful.

This trial, like Epstein’s, merely takes out the route-runners and I’m willing to bet their replacements are already in place. Getting very rich but this time, not getting the same publicity.

So, who are the abusers? Many, many high profile names have been mentioned but I have absolutely zero evidence to confirm any of them. So I won’t be mentioning any names. I can’t afford that level of lawyer.

We can be sure though, that the abusers will continue their activities, that they will simply replace Epstein and Maxwell – they probably already have – and that nothing will really change for them.

Some are saying that Maxwell will name names to get a lighter sentence. I don’t think she will. I think she’ll keep very quiet to get a lighter sentence, and more importantly, to stay alive. It’s clear from the Epstein case that these people do not mess around. I don’t know who they are but if I did, I have a feeling I’d keep quiet too. This is horse head in the bed stuff.

Epstein is dead, Maxwell’s behind bars, and in the end it will make no difference at all. The abuse will continue.

We just won’t be able to find it so easily now.

32 thoughts on “Bang! Bang! Maxwell’s in the slammer”

  1. Yes. What a crock of shit. I am left realing. Or did I mean reeling?
    I personally am not afraid but then I don’t actually know either. I could take a few guesses but my opinion is worth nothing.
    But then neither do I know about the Victims who appear to have made quite a lot of money. And are now coming back for more. Do they know where they are going? Only they know who abused them. If in fact they were abused.

    The whole thing has grossly depressed me although heaven knows why. I must have something much worse to worry about. Thank God that I don’t.
    My Mother would have seen them. And after I joined The Wrens then our Chief Wren would have made minced meat, and frequently did if she thought.
    I bet you all didn’t know that.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply ↓

  2. Nice title. The Beatles. Is there a prize? I know it was too easy and I don’t deserve one.

    The abusers – the ‘important’ ones, anyway – will stay protected. I think we all know that by now. ‘They’ go after the well-known oddballs in entertainment, perhaps to give the impression that they are doing something.

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply ↓

    • I thought about making it a competition but given the subject matter, it wouldn’t have been in the best of taste. It was also a bit too easy.

      Yes, there might be a few well known names implicated and even prosecuted, but the real big guns aren’t famous. Deliberately. They’ll get away and drop some of their useful idiots into the fiery lake… then they’ll get new human sheilds in place. And then it goes around again.

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply ↓

        • It wasn’t just girls. In this case it seems it only covered girl victims but there were boys too. And a lot of them never came back.

          There are some people in the world who are so evil it’s hard to believe.

          Liked by 2 people

          Reply ↓

            • No, you’re no fool. These people have been working themselves into power over centuries. They aren’t brought to light yet, but we are starting to see their shadows. It’s only just started and until recently, those trying to expose it have been derided as nutters.

              The things coming out are going to be hard to believe. That’s why they were so easy to keep secret – nobody can imagine they could be real.

              Liked by 2 people

              Reply ↓

  5. Near full term aborted body parts for sale.
    Giving infants and pregnant women experimental drugs booster after booster.
    Deciding to try to change children’s sex.
    Persuading children to worry about, and try to change their appearance.
    Infants’ beauty pageants and “talent” contests.
    Putting bras on young girls too young to have breasts. On the principle that what covers titilates.
    Dolls that emphasise or/and distort mature female features.
    Grown women who dress to look like younger girls.
    What could possibly go wrong?

    And by the way ‘n’ that, Happy Hogmanay. Despite Wee Nippie’s best efforts.
    Remember A Christmas Carol. Even the most Scrooge like, miserable, spoil sport, Holy Willie , lock the swings up Wee Free (sans the pretence of religion) can change.
    Or is that just fiction.
    Slainte !

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply ↓

    • I think the long term aim is a sub-class of genderless worker drones, incapable of reproduction. They might ‘farm’ some ‘breeders’ although the technology to grow babies in artificial wombs has been around for a few years already (Brave New World style). The model would be a bee or ant colony, all the workers are sterile drones and the ‘seed’ is provided by a few at the top.

      It will pretty much eliminate genetic diversity within a colony, which can only lead to disaster, but these people aren’t known for thinking that far ahead.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply ↓

  8. As Historian, child sex and trafficking has been with us always! This Maxwell customers are now much older and are probably impotent now (from medication or diabetes) or old age. Or dead! A new generation will take over. And after them, another. And so it goes. Forever! Who to blame? Now we have instant on-demand porn and the degradation of women who are partly to blame for trying to be ‘masculine’ and sexually liberated! In the generations that follow, who knows what might happen? What is the solution? I think the Maxwells are chicken feed! We congratulate ourselves too much. There are lots of customers waiting! where are THEY being served?

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply ↓

    • I think the Maxwells were couriers, they seemed powerful because they were rich but when things started to leak out, they were quickly thrown to the wolves. The fact that not one single customer was named suggests there weren’t any ‘common people’ on their lists, and the fact that they both kept absolutely silent suggests their customers were very big names indeed.
      As you say, it’s always happened and probably always will. As a kid, I remember the local known-to-be-pervy ones we all knew to keep away from but there was no internet back then, so they were only active locally. Now the bastards have global networks.

      Liked by 3 people

      Reply ↓

  11. Ghis was pimpin’ ’em to Jeff, who was prickin’ ’em
    in his many homes
    day and night, many boned by erect tube
    po-o-o-okes.

    Maxwell misled ’em so that Jeff could miss-bed ’em,
    girls not fully grown.
    Didn’t give a sh*t about strictures.
    no-o-o-o.

    Imprisoned them, would not let them go,
    with the help of his whore.

    Rancid Maxwell’s pimping manner’s
    what helped him to bed,
    bang, bang Maxwell’s little gals ’cured*;
    she and Jeff causing dread.

    Middle schoolers, them; Epstein put his tool in them—
    creep small girls enjoyed.
    Dershowitz et al. in this sordid
    sce-e-e-ene.

    Andy got some lays when from London far away;
    like Alan, he lied.
    Spiking 15’s fine for these sleazebags
    gro-o-o-oss!

    Because they yearned to shag girl sex toys,
    her job was some to find.

    Ghastly Maxwell’s pimping manner’s
    what helped them to bed,
    bang, bang Maxwell’s little gals ’cured*;
    ’hole rank crew causing dread.

    There was flirting, none, ’cause these guys were dirty scum;
    Maxwell helped them moan
    raping little virginal misses…
    guys don’t atone.

    Ghis acted slatternly for Jeff, who was happily
    screwing kids freely.
    But judged not was Jeffrey
    ’cause he somehow croa-oa-oa-oaked.
    But through the law’s hands the others slip,
    except procurer slime.

    Rank skank Maxwell’s pimping manner
    got her arrested.
    “Clang, clang!” go doors in the slammer.
    Like Jeff—maybe found dead?

    Pimping rancid tramp.

    Procured*

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply ↓

  12. The younger girls (early to mid teens) seemed to have been procured only for Epstein’s (and sometimes Maxwell’s) gratification rather than for their ‘friends’. The only girl who has accused anyone is Virginia Roberts and she has named only PA. My take on the whole thing so far has been that Epstein and Maxwell procured young teenage girls who were willing to do what was asked of them in exchange for money but, understandably, subsequently regretted it, but that the encounters were limited to Epstein and Maxwell. Roberts was older and lured with the promise of work as a masseuse and the opportunity to live a glitzy lifestyle.. She claims three encounters with PA who, she says, knew that she was 17 years old but she seems to be vague on what those encounters entailed saying only that Ghislaine told her that she had to do for PA what she did for Epstein. Why has Virginia Roberts not named any other ‘customers’? Why haven’t the other girls named anyone? Are the customers being blackmailed? Is VR being paid off? Why wasn’t VR afraid of the consequences of naming PA who I’m sure knows enough dodgy people with the wherewithal to threaten her? Why did Epstein take the incriminating photo of Roberts with PA – did he intend to blackmail PA? So many questions….

    Liked by 3 people

    Reply ↓

    • I can see two reasons why they’d seal the lists of contacts.

      It could be a list of business associates, friends and other associates who have attended perfectly innocent parties and meetings, and it might (or might not) include those who made use of their trafficking services. If there’s no evidence to separate the guilty ones from the rest of the list, releasing the list would be irresponsible and probably illegal. A lot of people who had nothing to do with all this would be targeted by the mob.

      It may be that they already know who, on that list, was involved and they are accumulating evidence. Releasing those names before there is sufficient evidence to prosecute would allow the suspects to flee the country or muddy the waters with defamation lawsuits.

      I suspect it’s the former. There are no doubt some shady characters on the sealed list, but without solid evidence there is no way to bring charges. Dropping the names without evidence means the named people can countersue, and also that innocent people might well be ‘judged’ by the mob. An accusation of this kind can end a career even if the accused is found innocent. It’s a stain that doesn’t go away.

      In either scenario, sealing the records is the only sensible way to proceed.

      Liked by 2 people

      Reply ↓

First comments are moderated to keep the spambots out. Once your first comment is approved, you're in.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.