And they shall be marked with the Sign…

So there’s this guy who works for a cleaning company. The company has bought a brand new van and sent it to have the company name painted on the side. When it’s ready, the guy is sent to fetch it and drive it back to base.

On the way back he incurs a £200 fine from the Antismoking Police.

He does not smoke.

No, it’s not one of those ‘lateral thinking’ puzzles. It is a real story.

Why was he stopped?

The operation – run by Haringey Council, police and bailiffs – was called ‘Operation Stop It’ and was aimed at cracking down on ‘unlicensed waste carriers’ – fly-tippers – and other vehicles guilty of ‘environmental crime’.

He was driving a brand new van with a brand new paint job depicting a cleaning firm. Which part of ‘Operation Stop It’ did he fall under?

Mr Beasley, who does not smoke, was warned that lighting up in company vehicles was illegal and that he would have been fined £50 if he had been caught taking a drag behind the wheel.

He does not smoke. That warning is as relevant as if they had warned me not to knit while travelling on a bus. I don’t know how to knit.

So he was stopped for no reason and warned not to do something he never does anyway. So far, so typical of the sad and small men who think the possession of a clipboard gives them a brain. They aren’t smart enough to see it does not.

Clipboard-wielding council officers then, however, spotted that he didn’t had a ‘no smoking’ sticker on his gleaming van and he was given an on-the-spot fine of £200.

He was not smoking. He does not smoke. Ever. Yet because he didn’t have a sign reminding him to not do something he never does, there is a clear and present danger that he might forget he’s a non-smoker and light one of the cigarettes he’s not carrying with a lighter he doesn’t own.

The council’s IQ can be deduced from the writing shown on the penalty notice. Also from their response to being told that they have, once again, demonstrated that a slime mould shows far better organisational skills and higher intelligence than the average council official.

‘We will continue to protect those workers who are forced to sit in smoke polluted environments because their employers don’t comply with the law which bans smoke in company vehicles.’

There’s really no point trying to reason with those who have long since lost the ability to think.

The truth is actually simple. You might think that as a non-smoker, you are safe from the Smoke Nazis. You might think that you can live your life with ease, not having to worry about the hate and the spite the antis direct at the smokers. You might think that you don’t need to be involved at all. You are wrong.

It’s not good enough to be a non-smoker. You must display the Symbol of Hate to demonstrate your devotion to the Inquisition. Even in places where nobody has ever smoked. Even though you, a non-smoker, have no intention of smoking and therefore have no need of a little spiteful sign telling you you can’t do what you never do. You must display the Symbol.

Otherwise, they assume you’re one of us and fine you accordingly.

That ‘Operation Stop It’ had nothing to do with the fly tipping or the unsafe vehicles they variously claim it was intended to deal with. It was a fine-collecting exercise. They were stopping people to see what they could find to fine them for.

Oh, and…

‘The irony is that if our technician had been smoking he would have been fined four time less, just £50.

Not so. If he had been smoking and had no sign to tell him not to, he would have been fined £250. Don’t try to make out that smokers are having an easy time of it, Daily Mail. Not when you are one of the most active hate-mongers out there.

18 thoughts on “And they shall be marked with the Sign…

  1. I’m glad that you are quoting the Mail verbatim Leggy as it also shows just how error strewn their article is grammar wise, “four time less” and “spotted that he didn’t had a ‘no smoking’ sticker”, these clowns can’t even throw a simple article together properly.

    Like

    • All about the money I suspect, tobacco is simply a highly convenient target.

      The parasite is killing the host, and as the impact becomes more obvious, and the easy cash flow dries up, they become more desperate. Things will get a lot worse before nature takes its course.

      Like

  2. As one of the Mail’s commenters said, I would do jail time rather than pay that fine. Make ’em take it to court, and demonstrate in front of the world how stupid the whole thing is. Oh, hang on, it’s a strict liability offence, isn’t it? That means if you have infringed the letter of the law by the tiniest amount, you are guilty with no possible defence, no matter how unreasonable the prosecution case. Modern Britain, land of heroes. How did we get here?

    Like

  3. “He was not smoking. He does not smoke. Ever. Yet because he didn’t have a sign reminding him to not do something he never does, there is a clear and present danger that he might forget he’s a non-smoker and light one of the cigarettes he’s not carrying with a lighter he doesn’t own.”

    Brilliant! You just made me laugh out loud on an otherwise rather-boring Sunday afternoon, Leggy. Thanks!

    Like

  4. A couple of things here:

    “… cracking down on ‘unlicensed waste carriers’ – fly-tippers” Well they say its to prevent fly-tipping but the scheme has some pretty potent unintended consequences, one of which actually increases fly-tipping.

    The idea seems reasonable enough; a simple tradesman might obtain a licence (£154 for 3 years) which permits them to take away rubbish from a job for disposal. But its much more onerous than that. An electrician, plumber or carpenter needs a licence merely to carry away small offcuts of cable, pipe or timber. Get caught with these materials in your van without a licence and the fines are hefty. Worse, the regulations are wider than those applying only to the carrier. Regularly instruct or engage others to do work that may also include rubbish removal (for example landlords) and you’ll need a waste brokers licence. You’re a householder having some plumbing done and the unlicensed tradesman kindly takes away his rubbish? You guessed it, you just broke the law and could be fined £5000 for not checking he’s registered.

    Try and dispose of commercial rubbish without the appropriate paperwork (and they’ve just tightened up on the rules again) and you’ll be turned away. So that’s another load of rubbish/scrap tipped in the kiddies park or onto the railway embankment.

    I’m a tradesman. I have the ubiquitous white van, tool belt and everything… I even whistle at the girls (even though I like the boys more). And yeah, I have the regulation issue ‘no smoking’ sticker displayed in the cab while happily chuffing away on the Marlboros. I’m allowed to do this because the vehicle is for my sole use. Run into one of those ‘multi-agency roadside checks’ (which they have frequently in these parts) and I’ve lit up even before applying the handbrake. There’s nothing funnier than seeing a red faced official dressed in florescent yellow flapping his clipboard around. More merriment follows when they’ve half written the ticket before speaking to you and discovering they won’t be issuing one. I’m sure they have to fill in some forms later back in the office to explain why they defaced Government property… I hope so.

    I like these MA checks. Sure its a bit like a mobile McCarthy Trial but I find them amusing on so many levels, more so for the hierarchical way the various officials present themselves. The police are always first, followed by HMRC, then Border Agency, VOSA, DWP and then Environment Agency (usually some twit from the local council on secondment). Last time, I was treated to a couple of freshly minted council climate change advisers straight out of Uni who informed me that carrying around unnecessary tools/equipment was flooding the Maldives. Well, having taken out that sack of plaster Maldivians everywhere can sleep peacefully tonight. You don’t always get the full set of officials, and strangely the big agencies are the least officious. The lapdogs from DWP downwards are the most officious, least humorous but also the easiest to play with. Last time, I told each official how much the process felt like a ‘speed dating for tradesmen’. Oddly, the police officers found this comment highly amusing, the others increasingly less so. The climate advisor gals seemed positively offended (obviously, lesbians I thought) and looked behind them in hope the Equalities lot were part of today’s roadside circus (it can only be time before they are included).

    For those not caught up in these things… you must be so pleased at how much better your lives are now days. What’s that, there’s no difference? Are you sure? This crap if costing you a fortune in taxes, and you do know tradesmen everywhere are passing the costs onto you also? You do know that? Don’t you?

    Like

    • You’re a householder having some plumbing done and the unlicensed tradesman kindly takes away his rubbish? You guessed it, you just broke the law and could be fined £5000 for not checking he’s registered.

      That explains why the dud fan from my boiler is still here. I had wondered about that – whether it was something to do with it being mine and therefore my responsibility or something. So if the plumber had taken the dud fan away, he risked a fine and so did I?

      I am tempted to cover it in gold leaf and enter it for the Turner prize…

      Like

      • First random result from Google says….

        Householders who employ tradesmen to carry out work on their house should check that the waste produced is to be handled in a responsible and legal manner.
        If you hire builders, kitchen fitters, window fitters, gardeners, plumbers etc who take waste away from your house, these contractors must have a Waste Carrier’s Licence. You should ask for their waste carrier number and to check its validity before engaging them.

        On occasion rubbish can end up being fly tipped. If that’s the case, not only will the contractor be prosecuted, but the householder can be fined for failing to ensure that the waste was passed on to an authorised person.

        The Environmental Health Department and the Environment Agency both offer the same advice; if your contractor says he will remove the rubbish and he is not registered, don’t employ him: engage someone who is.

        Most councils are spouting the same rubbish (pun intended). Here’s Harringay:

        Registered waste carriers

        The Environmental Protection (Duty of Care) Regulations 1991 (as amended), require all householders to make sure their waste is only removed from their premises by registered waste carriers. Householders not taking reasonable measures to do so could face fines of up to £5000.

        By the way, its not just fly-tipping. The Enviro-fascists are already out in their vans spying on potential rubbish smugglers. I know of one instance personally where they watched builders for two days removing rubbish from a customer’s property. After following the builder home and issuing a penalty to him, they returned to the property and issued the householder with a fine.

        Like

  5. Never been too sure what “four time(s) less” means. Four times what less? I suppose that, in this case, they meant “four times thirty seven point five less”; but it would have been a lot easier, more logical, and correct, to have said “£150 less”. Or, perhaps they meant one fourth….

    Like

  6. Please tell me this story is all a spoof. Please.

    You’re making this Californian cringe in horror and thank his lucky stars that at least this kind of thing doesn’t happen here. Of course, I don’t live in the San Francisco Bay area, where it’s entirely possible. Times four. Confiscate the White Van. Life in prison without parole.

    Go Baltimore Ravens!

    Like

  7. While slime molds are amazing organisms (everyone should read up on their amazing lifestyle), I think it’s more amazing that a council official with an obviously substantially lower IQ than a slime mold can tie their shoelaces and feed themselves…

    Like

First comments are moderated to keep the spambots out. Once your first comment is approved, you're in.

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.